gtd « ihumanable

Posts Tagged: gtd

philosophy / work — 2 Comments
5
Feb 10

persist

measure twice, turn once

I just witnessed an interesting even unfold in front of my current client’s building. Today in beautiful Columbus, Ohio we are experiencing one hell of a winter storm, lots of fun. A semi truck decided that our parking lot was a great place to turn around in, he just apparently forgot to measure. CRASH BOOM and the lamppost has changed from its normal 90° to a more precarious 78ish°. After striking the lamppost and ramming a concrete barrier the semi was fairly well wedged, but the driver continued revving and the engine struggled and moaned. This persistence paid off and after about 10 minutes of maneuvering he was free. Now to call the insurance companies.

This got me thinking about the nature of difficult situations (self-imposed or otherwise). I also had a breakthrough largely due to persistence today, so happy coincidence. After months of working on documentation, being told that I would never be allowed to program the sacred system, the tides have turned (thanks to an excessively high quote) and the coach has called me up, and I’m ready to play under the bright lights.

I’ve just completed printing out 400 pages of documentation (my weekend is going to be so much fun!) and I will prepare myself for the difficult task ahead. My persistence has paid off, but the bigger realization is that persistence in general pays off.

To borrow one of my favorite quotes from Scrubs, “People are bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.” People don’t ever want to think that you can succeed, and they are going to tell you no over and over again. There are two reasons for people to shut down your dreams:

They have tried and failed, the task is impossible, your success would undermine them. If you succeed where they have failed then it isn’t an impossible task, they just weren’t good enough to do it.
The have achieved it, but only by their virtue of their amazing talents and pure force of will. You don’t have what it takes!

This is why it’s vitally important to ask people for advice, sage wisdom, realistic assessments, but always keep in mind that very few people actually want you to succeed, especially if its in something they can’t or already have. Don’t worry though, these aren’t bad people, it’s human nature, and when you succeed you will act the same way. Success through hardship and against the odds plays a fun trick on the human brain, it makes you believe you pulled off the impossible. This feels amazing and so you will do anything in to hold on to it, and you don’t want some dirty unwashed masses pulling off the same feat and diminishing it.

The big lesson here though is persistence, the most successful people in the world are those that were willing to have the door slammed in their faces 1000 times before making that sale. This is what you need to do, steel yourself for the struggle, prepare to be emotionally drained, and realize that this is what living is. Life is a stream of people telling you no, with the occasional yes. What separates the successful from the mediocre is that the successful are willing to wade through all the noes to get to the sweet succulent yes.

I’ve been paying my dues on this project for 3 months, and finally I get to go back to what I love the most, coding. There are a hundred stories of people trying and failing and trying and failing and trying and failing to finally succeed. It is definitely the path less taken, but it will make all the difference.

philosophy — 2 Comments
2
Feb 10

stupid ideas

No caption needed

I want to be honest with you for a minute, I have lots of stupid ideas. I have them all day, in the shower, while eating a sandwich, while writing my blog posts, stupid ideas come streaming into my head. I used to just ignore them, “No one needs a peanut powered lawnmower” I would tell myself. The interesting turn was when I started writing these stupid ideas down.

Some stupid ideas will always remain stupid ideas, some though will change over time. That dumb idea might actually just be so brilliant it looks stupid. It might be so big and scary that you’ve convinced yourself it’s stupid. It might not be a bad idea at all, after some careful reflection. It might even be a wonderful idea.

Why do we throw away our stupid ideas? Is it because we don’t have time for them, bah, that can’t be it, you are currently wasting precious time reading the stupid things I have to say. Is it because we are so swamped with brilliant ideas that we have to prioritize, probably not, or else you’d be sipping margaritas next to your perpetual motion machine. No, the answer is much simpler, its because we are afraid or failing. Stupid ideas are failure babies, a dumb idea grows up to be a hairy ugly failure, and we have learned in the school of life that failures are bad, so we avoid them.

Have you ever talked to a 4 year old? I have on various occasions, interesting little buggers those 4 year olds. They will tell you every little thought that bounces into their overly energetic little brains, no matter how wrong or foolish. They don’t mind failing over and over again, they will insist the moon is made of mashed potatoes and not feel bad at all when you tell them the truth. And most importantly they learn a ton of information.

Now don’t take this the wrong way, I don’t think you should just go around like some half-cocked lunatic spouting off every little thing that pops into your head. There was a time for that and if you go into the board room now insisting the moon is made of mashed potatoes you will be roundly mocked and rightfully so. What I am advocating is the preservation and analysis of your stupid ideas. Let’s take a look at some stupid ideas quickly to see why this is useful.

Idea #1: A blanket that has arm holes and you wear it backwards or something… yea like a backwards robe! Pretty fucking stupid, but better known as the Snuggie, which has become a huge success and sold tons.
Idea #2: Instead of executing the code on this machine, let’s build another machine that doesn’t actually exist and have that fake machine live on the real machine and have code execute on the fake machine…. What? What are you rambling about Jenkins, get out of my office! Jenkins just invented the Virtual Machine architecture that power things like Java’s JVM and .Net’s CLR.
Idea #3: Wouldn’t it be awesome if you could tape together 4 iPhones and have like a really big iPhone. I’m sorry, did you just smoke a bunch of peyote?! That’s dumb…. Or its the new iPad.

You get the picture I’m trying to paint here. A lot of the amazing things we take for granted and depend upon everyday, things that seem like great ideas now, all had a moment in time when they were some far-fetched pie-in-the-sky dream. Most ideas start off as stupid ideas. Stupid ideas are important and valuable, not all of them, but there will be some diamonds in those dirt clods. You just have to be smart enough to sift through them.

My advice to you is to jot down those stupid ideas you normally throw by the wayside. Revisit them every once and a while, re-evaluate their “stupidness.” Sometimes you will find a diamond in the rough, sometimes a stupid idea can be the spark needed to have a brilliant idea, and sometimes you will just get a good laugh out of the stupid things you think up.

code / work — 1 Comment
29
Jan 10

learn autoit

Bezels and shadows and reflections, oh my

If you use windows at work or at play this post is for you, macheads and linux people I’m sorry, this post probably won’t help you much. I have had the joy of doing documentation work for the last 2-3 months at work. Gnarly, ugly documentation that serves little purpose other than making someone feel happy that there are reams and reams of documentation. At some point, probably around the 5th document, I made the realization that out of 20 pages it was mostly boilerplate, with about 8 things peppered throughout that changed. I decided that it would be easiest to make a template document and then just do a find and replace on those eight symbols [[DOCNUM]] [[DOCNAME]] [[DOCTRANSACTION]] etc.

Productivity shot up, I could now stub out a document in a few minutes instead of the hour or so that it used to take to manually hunt through and change things. All was well and after a day or two of find / replacing I had stubbed out the 80 or so documents. Then came the meeting where it was decided that 2 new sections would be needed and that 8 sections could be removed as being redundant. This victory for common sense was also a giant headache, as I didn’t really look forward to restubbing 80 documents. There had to be an easier way, a better way, I remembered a screen driver tool I had some exposure to at a past engagement, AutoIt.

After reading through the documentation and goofing around with it for a while yesterday I now have a fully functional script that will automatically stub out all of the documentation with the click of a button. A task that used to be an error-prone, manually intensive process now requires no intervention. We can restub on demand now, so changing the template is no problem.

The Good

Saves a ton of time
Removes the human aspect from an existing process
Centralizes specific knowledge
Easy to write and test

The new script saves a ton of time, I can regenerate all documentation in about 10 minutes, so I click a button and go walk around the office bugging people. AutoIt simply takes a known working process and steps in to be the person driving it, I didn’t have to take time dreaming up a brand new workflow, I could focus on just getting it done. The script is now the system of record for the specific things that change from document to document, which is nice for trying to determine at a glance what makes an HCR1 different from a ARC6 command, without digging through 40 pages of documentation. AutoIt also utilizes a stripped down version of SciTE with auto-completion and built in support for compiling and running, which makes writing and testing the script a breeze.

The Bad

Ugly syntax (like VBScript and PHP had a bastard child)
Oddly organized documentation and variably helpful community
Inherently brittle scripts
Still slower than I’d like
Foreground processing

AutoIt has an ugly syntax (think VBScript), but it has all the pieces parts to make a nice script, functions and variables. The documentation takes a little getting used to, there is plenty in there, but it could be organized better. AutoIt depends on things like the window title and absolute paths, so it is inherently brittle, I doubt this script would run unaltered on someone else’s machine. This could just be me being a n00b at AutoIt but I followed the practices laid out in the tutorials and the documentation. The other bad part about AutoIt is that it drives your screen, it simulates you pressing buttons and mousing about, so the script is slow and you can’t interact with the machine while its running or you will probably mess everything up.

Alternatives

After proclaiming my victory over the documentation monster, I got some replies from colleagues asking why I didn’t just make a powershell or ruby program or java program or something. I could have cracked open OpenWriter or something and attempted to build some massive program that could create .docx files, but that would have taken a ton of time. The AutoIt solution was incredibly quick to produce, took about 2 hours of playing around with it. There were a bunch of side benefits that the alternatives wouldn’t have had. The template file is just a plain ordinary .docx file with all kinds of crazy formatting and images, instead of trying to figure out how to reproduce this in code, I can use Word to do the heavy lifting for me. This allows business users to change the template and we can rapidly restub and get back up and running.

Conclusion

You should go and learn AutoIt or AppleScript or whatever GUI driver program is available for your platform. It is not the tool for every job, but it’s perfect for some jobs. Being the person on your team that can take some boring, error-prone, laborious task and turn it into a turn-crank task is a great thing. You can save your team time, get back to doing actual work more quickly, and make a name for yourself as a problem solver.

philosophy / work — 3 Comments
12
Jan 10

who cares?

I shot who in the what now?

It’s one of my favorite questions to ask during a technical discussion. Who cares? Some others I like to throw out our, why should I care? why does it matter? and I don’t care! Am I some sort of raging lunatic completely out of my mind and trying to pick a fight with everyone I meet? Yes, but that’s not why I ask these questions. I ask these questions because as great as the big picture is we sometimes have to drop complexities to get stuff done.

When you have a big flow diagram or giant UML Class Hierarchy it can be fun to think about the abstract way that things interact and how you can pass state around and whatnot. This definitely is useful for getting a feel for a new system, but then there comes the worst part of any software developer’s job, actually getting things done. You see that’s what we get paid for, actually putting our fingers on keys, typing stuff out, compiling it, and shipping a product. Part of this is doing the upfront design work and getting all of our t’s crossed and i’s dotted, but just as important is actually getting something working.

I talked about this before in my post about simplifying things. This simple question, “who cares?” (you can be more diplomatic about it if you like) is a great tool for getting to the heart of a problem. I like the simplicity and straight-forwardness of the question, it normally catches people off guard and challenges their assumptions.

Frank: So we need to pass this data into the layer
Bob: Who cares?
Frank (taken aback): I care, I care deeply about this data
Bob: But why do you care about it being in that layer, its just going to hand it off to this layer, and that layer doesn’t care at all about it
Frank: I guess you are right, we don’t need it there

BAM!!! Problem simplified! For anyone that’s ever taken any education classes you may recognize this as a rather blunt application of Socratic Method. The point is confrontation, but not between the two people discussing something, between each person and their preconceived notions about a problem or situation.

In High School I took a chemistry class, it is one of the few classes that I really remember in any detail from so long ago, the teacher taught the entire semester in Socratic Method. He would question us, we would experiment, we would reason out why we observed what we observed, he prodded us, and we cherished our knowledge. Anyone can tell you water is composed of 2 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom, but when you had to work for it, when you had to defend your knowledge of it from scrutiny, it became concrete, it became your discovery.

Applying this to software development is useful, we can get locked into our preconceived notions, and direct, blunt, sometimes even rude questions can spur you to really consider what you are talking about. Software is incredibly fluid, sometimes an idea or concept can become out-dated in a matter of months or a matter of hours. The biggest ones are the most difficult to challenge, because they often have the most dependent code around them, but this makes them the most important to constantly consider.

Keeping your conceptual design, implementation, and solution in lock step with a problem domain often involves some amount of change, that change can be hard to come by though. By challenging our standing beliefs we can find new avenues for exploration or strengthen the existing techniques and gain a better understanding of them.

ihumanableusable in any place a human can be used